ON THE CONCEPT OF TERM EQUIVALENCE

Vol.1, Issue 1, 2015, pp.4-17 Full text

Author: Diana Yankova

Affiliation: New Bulgarian University, Sofia, Bulgaria

Abstract
The article considers some terminological aspects in the process of harmonization of legislation reflecting on different approaches to the study of terms and especially to synonymy and term equivalence. The various mechanisms available to the translator are examined within the EU context and against the background of Bulgaria’s legal culture. The analysis is based on translations of EU legislation from English into Bulgarian and highlights felicitous choices and techniques employed, as well as recurring inconsistencies in the long and arduous process of approximation of legislation.

Keywords: harmonization of legislation, supranational law, EU directives, legal terminology, translation equivalence, translation strategies, multilingual communication

Article history:
Received: 15 July 2014
Accepted: 21 December 2014
Published: 1 February 2015


Citation (APA6):
Yankova, D. (2015). On the concept of term equivalence. English Studies at NBU, 1(1), 4-17. Retrieved from http://esnbu.org/data/files/2015/2015-1-1-yankova-pp4-17.pdf

Copyright © 2015 Diana Yankova


This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. If you want to use the work commercially, you must first get the author's permission.

References:

Jacobs, R. (1995). English Syntax: a Grammar for English Language Professionals. Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

de Groot, G-R. (2000). Translating Legal Information. In G. Zaccaria (Ed.), Journal of Legal Hermeneutics. Translation in Law, 5 (pp. 131-149). Lit Verlag MünsterHamburg-London.

Delors, J. (1992, April 11). Survival of the fattest. The Economist, p.32.

Fillmore, C. (1968). The Case for Case. In E. Bach & R.T. Harms (Eds.), Universals in Linguistic Theory (pp. 1-88). New York: Holt.
Google Scholar

Forrest, A. (1998). The Challenges of Languages in Europe. Terminologie et traduction 3, 101-121.

Robertson, C. (2001). Multilingual Law: A Framework for Understanding LSP within the EU. In F. Mayer (Ed.), Language for Special Purposes: Perspectives for the New Millennium, 2 (pp.697-703), Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.
Google Scholar

Trosborg, A. (1997). Translating Hybrid Political Texts. In: A. Trosborg (Ed.), Text Typology and Translation (pp. 145-158). John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/btl.26.12tro ☍ -|- Google Scholar

Šarčević, S. (1997). New Approach to Legal Translation. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
Google Scholar

Yankova, D., & Vassileva, I. (2002). Supranational Legislative Texts: a New Challenge for Translators in Europe. In H. P. Kelz (Ed.), Die sprachliche Zukunft Europas. Mehrsprachigkeit und Sprachenpolitik (pp. 145-158). Nomos-Verlag, Baden Baden.
View Chapter

Yankova, D. (2003). Towards Achieving Equivalence in Bulgarian-English Translation of Statutory Writing. Чуждоезиково обучение [Foreign Language Teaching] 3, 52-63.

Discuss