DIFFERENCES IN RESEARCH ABSTRACTS WRITTEN IN ARABIC, FRENCH, AND ENGLISH
Vol.6, Issue 2, 2020, pp. 233-248 Full text
Web of Science: 000607561000005
Abdelmajid Bouziane https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4138-2450
Fatima Ezzahra Metkal
Affiliation: Faculty of Letters and Humanities Ben M’Sik, Hassan II University of Casablanca
Conceptualization; Supervision; Validation; Writing – review and editing: A.B. (lead);
Methodology: F.E.M. (lead), A.L. (supporting);
Investigation; Formal Analysis: A.B., F.E.M. (equal);
Data curation; Visualization; Project Administration; Writing – original draft: F.E.M.(lead)
The proliferation of publications, mainly the digital ones, makes it necessary to write well-structured abstracts which help readers gauge the relevance of articles and thus attract a wider readership. This article investigates whether abstracts written in three languages, namely Arabic, French and English, follow the same patterns within or across languages. It compares 112 abstracts in the areas of (applied) linguistics. The English abstracts include 36 research article (RA) abstracts from an Arab journal mostly written by non-natives and 10 by native speakers from British universities. Those produced in French are 36 divided into two sets, 23 from North African journals and the remaining 13 from French journals. The Arabic abstracts consist of 30 abstracts, 15 from North African journals mainly from Tunisia, Algeria, and Morocco and the other 15 from the Middle East with a focus on Qatari and Saudi texts. Results emanating from the frequency of moves show that the abstracts written in English by natives and non-natives and those produced in Arabic by Middle Eastern writers show conformity with the existing conventions of abstract writing in English. However, those from North Africa, be they Arabic or French, do not share any specific patterns which can be attributed to the language in which they are written. Further research is needed to check whether abstract writing is part of the academic writing curriculum in these two latter languages.
Keywords: differences, abstracts, Arabic, French, English
Submitted: 25 May 2020
Reviewed: 27 November 2020
Accepted: 1 December 2020
Published: 21 December 2020
Bouziane, A. and Metkal, F. E. (2020). Differences in Research Abstracts written in Arabic, French, and English. English Studies at NBU, 6(2), 233-248. https://doi.org/10.33919/esnbu.20.2.4
Copyright © 2020 Abdelmajid Bouziane and Fatima Ezzahra Metkal
This open access article is published and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. If you want to use the work commercially, you must first get the authors' permission.
Alotaibi, H. (2013). Research Article Abstracts and Introductions: A Comparative Genre-Based Study of Arabic and English in the Fields of Educational Psychology and Sociology. ['Unpublished doctoral dissertation']. Texas A&M University-Commerce.
ANSI/NISO (1997). Guidelines for Abstracts. NISO Press.
Behnam, B. & Golpour, F. (2014). A Genre analysis of English and Iranian research articles abstracts in applied linguistics and mathematics. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 3(5), 173-179. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.3n.5p.173
Briones, R. R. Y. (2018). Move analysis of abstracts in applied linguistics research: The Middle East and North Africa (MENA) perspective. Asian Journal of English Language Studies (AJELS), 6, 25-55.
Can, S.; Karabacak, E.; & Qin, J. (2016). Structure of moves in research article abstracts in applied linguistics. Publications, 4(23), 2-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications4030023
Çakır, H. (2016). Native and non-native writers' use of stance adverbs in English research article abstracts. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 6, 85-96. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojml.2016.62008
Darabad, M. A. (2016). Move analysis of research article abstracts: A cross-disciplinary study. International Journal of Linguistics, 8(2), 125-140. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v8i2.9379
Ebrahimi, S. F & Chan, S. H. (2015). Research article abstracts in applied linguistics and economics: Functional analysis of the grammatical subject. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 35(4), 381–397.
EL-Dakhs, D. A. (2018). Comparative genre analysis of research article abstracts in more and less prestigious journals: Linguistics journals in focus. Research in Language, 16(1), 47-63. https://doi.org/10.2478/rela-2018-0002
Fallatah, W. (2016). Features of Saudi English research articles abstracts. Arab World English Journal, 7(2), 368-379. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol7no2.25
Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. Longman.
Ji, X. L. (2015). Comparison of abstracts written by native speakers and second language learners. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 5, 470-474. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojml.2015.55041
Kanoksilapatham, B. (2005). Rhetorical structure of biochemistry research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 24, 269–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2004.08.003
Katic M., Safranj J. (2018). An Analysis of Dissertation Abstracts Written by Non-native English Speakers at a Serbian University: Differences and Similarities Across Disciplines. In Chitez M., Doroholschi C., Kruse O., Salski Ł., Tucan D. (Eds.), University Writing in Central and Eastern Europe: Tradition, Transition, and Innovation. Multilingual Education, vol 29. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95198-0_16
Miech, E. J.; Nave, B.; & Mosteller, F. (2005). The 20,000 Article Problem: How a Structured Abstract can Help Practitioners Sort out Educational Research. The Phi Delta Kappan, 86(5), 396-400. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170508600512
Montesi, M. and Owen, J. M. (2007). Revision of author abstracts: how it is carried out by LISA editors. Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives, 59(1), 26-45. https://doi.org/10.1108/00012530710725197
Newsom, T. W. (2011). A Critical Analysis of Ph.D. and Ed.D. Dissertation Abstracts Published During 2009 And 2010. ['Unpublished doctoral dissertation']. University of North Texas.
Ross J. S., Gross C. P., Desai, M.M., Hong, Y., Grant, A.O., Daniels, S.R. Hachinski, V. C., Gibbons, R. J. Gardner, T.J. Harlan M. Krumholz, H. M. (2006). Effect of Blinded Peer Review on Abstract Acceptance. JAMA. 295(14), 1675–1680. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.295.14.1675
Stein, W. (1997). A Genre Analysis of the TESOL Conference Abstract. ['Unpublished doctoral dissertation']. University of Central Oklahoma.
Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.
Tabatabaei, S. P.; Najafi, Z., and Gobadirad, H. (2016). The Rhetorical Structure of M.A. Abstracts Written by Students of English Language Teaching in Iran. Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods (MJLTM), 6(2), 535-543.
Vrijhoef, HJM & Steuten, LMG (2007). How to write an abstract. European Diabetes Nursing, 4(3), 124-127 https://doi.org/10.1002/edn.93
Wang, W. (2002). Optimal Components of Research Publication Abstracts: Producing Abstracts that Meet the American National Standards. ['Unpublished doctoral dissertation']. The University of Mississippi.
Wang, S. P. & Tu, P. N. (2014). Tense use and move analysis in journal article abstracts. Taiwan Journal of TESOL, 11(1), 3-29.
Yang, L. X., & Tian, Y. (2015). A Cross-disciplinary study of evidentiality in abstracts of English research articles. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 5, 399-411. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojml.2015.54036
1. Reviewer's name: Undisclosed
Review Content: Undisclosed
Review Verified on Publons
2. Reviewer's name: Undisclosed
Review Content: Undisclosed
Review Verified on Publons
Handling Editor: Stan Bogdanov, PhD, New Bulgarian University
Verified Editor Record on Publons