VISUAL METAPHOR IN EARLY SECOND LANGUAGE EDUCATION
Web of Science: 001021117300001
Milena Levunlieva https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3532-1141
Affiliation: South-West University "Neofit Rilski", Blagoevgrad, Bulgaria
The paper adapts the theory of knowledge enablement in knowledge-sharing companies to the needs of the second-language classroom to explicate the association between pedagogical interaction and the effectiveness of the teaching process. The goal of the inquiry is to alert language teachers to the hidden opportunities visualization and layout suggest in designing a stress-free educational environment conducive to amplifying language knowledge and skills in a context stimulating knowledge enablement. Visualization is explored at two levels: 1) the level of text layout and illustrations; and 2) the level of visual images and visual metaphors. The method of structural and functional modelling is used to present the layout of exercises and language content and the visual metaphor identification method is employed in the analysis of visual images. A conclusion is asserted of the instrumental role of visuals in English coursebooks for young learners as a medium of visual literacy and as a factor in streamlining the development of productive second language skills. This claim is substantiated by a case study that 1) demonstrates the contextualizing function of images and visual metaphors in English language coursebooks for young learners; and 2) explores the means, instruments and ways of visualizing the instructional content of two TEYL coursebooks published in 2014 and 2015.
Keywords: knowledge enablement, visual metaphor, visual literacy, visual layout, stress-free environment
Submitted: 24 February 2023
Reviewed: 25 February 2023
Accepted: 13 March 2023
Published: 20 June 2023
Levunlieva, M. (2023). Visual Metaphor in Early Second Language Education. English Studies at NBU, 9(1), 5-20. https://doi.org/10.33919/esnbu.23.1.1
Copyright © 2023 Milena Levunlieva
This open access article is published and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. If you want to use the work commercially, you must first get the authors' permission.
Avgerinou, M. (2009). Re-Viewing Visual Literacy in the "Bain d'Images" Era. Tech Trends, 53, 28-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-009-0264-z
Darzhavni obrazovatelni standarti (DOS) Naredba No 5 ot 30.11.2015 za obshtoobrazovatelna podgotovka ['State educational standards, Act No 5 of 30.11.2015 for general education']. Darzhaven Vestnik br. 95/08.12.2015.
Dondis, D. A. (1973). A primer of visual literacy. MIT Press.
Dooley, J. & Evans, V. (2014). Fairyland 3. Activity book. Express Publishing.
Dooley, J. & Evans, V. (2014). Fairyland 3. Student's book. Express Publishing.
Dooley, J. & Evans, V. (2015). Fairyland 4. Activity book. Express Publishing.
Dooley, J. & Evans, V. (2015). Fairyland 4. Student's book. Express Publishing.
Eppler, M. J. & Burkhard, R. A. (2005). Knowledge visualization. In Schwarts, D. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of knowledge management (pp. 551-560). Idea Group. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59140-573-3.ch072
Evans, V., M. Green (2006). Cognitive linguistics. An introduction. Edinburgh University Press.
Felten, P. (2008). Visual literacy. Change: The magazine of higher learning, 40(6), 60–64. https://doi.org/10.3200/CHNG.40.6.60-64
Forceville, Charles (2016). Pictorial and Multimodal Metaphor. In Klug, N, S. Hartmut (Eds.), Handbuch Sprache im multimodalen Kontext ['The handbook of language in multimodal contexts']. Linguistic Knowledge series``. Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110296099-011
Gee, J. P. & Hayes, E. R. (2011). Language and learning in the digital age. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203830918
Grice, P. (1989). Studies in the way of words. Harvard University Press.
Guiora, A. Z. (1983). The dialectic of language acquisition. Language Learning, 33(5), 3-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1984.tb01321.x
Krashen, S. (1985). Language Acquisition and Language Education. Alemany Press.
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and the Challenge to Western Thought. Basic Books.
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things. What categories reveal about the mind. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
Lengler, R. & Eppler, M. (2007). Towards a periodic table of visualization methods. Proceedings from IASTED International Conference on Graphics and Visualization in Engineering GVE 2006. Clearwater, Florida.
Levunlieva, M. (2011). The conceptual domain WATER/LIQUIDS as a source of ontological metaphors in English and Bulgarian. ['Unpublished doctoral dissertation']. Sofia University St. Kiment Ohridski.
Mitchell, W. J. T. (1986). Iconology: Image, text, ideology. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226148052.001.0001
Peterson, M., Wise, K. Lindgren, R.¸Cox, D. & Mathayas, N. (2015). Understanding visual metaphor. https://textimage.org/indices/pdf/Understanding-Visual-Metaphor.pdf
Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of reality in the child. (M. Cook, Trans.). Basic Books. https://doi.org/10.1037/11168-000
Propp, V. (1968). Morphology of the folk tale. University of Texas Press. https://doi.org/10.7560/783911
Salbero, N., Heberle, V., da Silva Balen, M. G. S. (2015). A visual analysis of English textbooks: Multimodal scaffolded learning. Calidoscópio, 13(1), 5-13. https://doi.org/10.4013/cld.2015.131.01
Sausseur, F. (1983). Course in general linguistics. Duckworth.
Seels, B. A. (1994). Visual literacy: The definition problem. In D. M. Moore & F. M. Dwyer (Eds.), Visual literacy: A spectrum of visual learning (pp. 97-112). Educational Technology Publications.
Serafini, F. (2017). Visual literacy. In G. Noblit (Ed.), Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.19
Sorm, E. & Steen, G. (2018). VISMIP. Towards a method for visual metaphor identification. In G. Steen (Ed.), Visual metaphor: Structure and process (pp. 47-88). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.18.03sor
Sturken, M., L. Cartwright (2001). Practices of looking. An introduction to visual culture. Oxford University Press.
The New London Group (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard educational review, 66(1), 60-93. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u
Tsankov, N. (2018). The transversal competence for problem-solving in cognitive learning. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 6(3), 67-82. https://doi.org/10.5937/ijcrsee1803067T
Yu, N. (1995). Metaphorical expression of anger in English and Chinese. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 10(2), 59–92. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms1002_1
Zvegintsev, A. R. (1975). Language and its relation to thought. Proceedings of the XV World Congress of Philosophy, vol. 5, 493-496. https://doi.org/10.5840/wcp1519755100]
1. Reviewer's name: Undisclosed
Review Content: Undisclosed
Review Verified on Publons
2. Reviewer's name: Undisclosed
Review Content: Undisclosed
Review Verified on Publons
Handling Editor: Stan Bogdanov
Verified Editor Record on Publons