ACADEMIC INTEGRITY - FRAGILE BY DEFINITION OR BY NEGLECT?
Vol.12, Issue 1, 2026, pp. 260-273 Full text: PDF . HTML
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33919/esnbu.26.1.15
Web of Science: [WOS=]
Author:
Elena Blagoeva https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8063-6433
Affiliation: New Bulgarian University, Sofia, Bulgaria 002qhr126
Abstract
The article examines academic dishonesty as a persistent and deepening issue within university environments. Cheating is considered not only an ethical concern but also a socially and culturally conditioned phenomenon. The article presents original research involving a survey of 125 respondents and focus group discussions. The first set of questions addresses the types of academic misconduct students have observed, while the second explores what they perceive as dishonest behavior. The focus groups revealed ambivalence: cheating is seen as "wrong," but often "not that serious." The causes of academic dishonesty are multifaceted: low self-esteem, pressure to succeed, lack of understanding of academic rules, weak moral culture, and societal tolerance for unethical behavior. Information technologies, particularly artificial intelligence, are also identified as additional catalysts. The article reinforces the idea that academic integrity cannot be enforced through statements and declarations alone. What is needed is a cultural shift within universities - through the implementation of clear policies, ethical education, institutional transparency, and student engagement. Cheating is not merely an individual failure, but a systemic issue that requires a comprehensive institutional response.
Keywords: academic misconduct, academic integrity, plagiarism, cheating, Higher education
Article history:
Submitted: 11 June 2025
Reviewed: 01 July 2025
Accepted: 10 August 2025
Published: 20 June 2026
Citation (APA):
Blagoeva, E. (2026). Academic integrity - fragile by definition or by neglect?. English Studies at NBU, 12(1), 260-273. https://doi.org/10.33919/esnbu.26.1.15
Copyright © 2026 Elena Blagoeva
This is an Open Access article published and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
References
Bucciol, A., Cicognani, S., & Montinari, N. (2020). Cheating in university exams: Evidence from Italy. Cheating in university exams: the relevance of social factors. International Review of Economics, 67, 319-338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-019-00343-8
Coren, A. (2011). Turning a blind eye: Faculty who ignore student cheating. Journal of Academic Ethics, 9(4), 291-305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-011-9147-y
Diekhoff, G. M., LaBeff, E. E., Shinohara, K., & Yasukawa, H. (1996). College cheating in Japan and the United States. Research in Higher Education, 37(4), 425-439. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01730112
DiPietro, M. (2010). Theoretical frameworks for academic dishonesty. To Improve the Academy: A Journal of Educational Development, 28, 250-262. https://doi.org/10.3998/tia.17063888.0028.018
Miller, D., Murdock, T., Anderman, E., & Poindexter, A. (2007). Who are all these cheaters? Characteristics of academically dishonest students. In E. M. Anderman & T. B. Murdock (Eds.), Psychology of Academic Cheating (pp. 9-32). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012372541-7/50003-6
Olivia-Dumitrina, N., Casanovas, M. & Capdevila, Y. (2019). Academic Writing and the Internet: Cyber-Plagiarism amongst University Students. J. New Approaches Educ. Res. 8, 112–125. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2019.7.407
Pupovac, V., Bilic-Zulle, L., & Petrovecki, M. (2008). Sobre el plagi acadèmic a Europa. Un enfocament analític basat en quatre estudis. Digithum, 10, 13-18. https://doi.org/10.7238/d.v0i10.507
Vandehey, M. A., Diekhoff, G. M., & LaBeff, E. E. (2007). College cheating: A twenty-year follow-up and the Addition of an Honor Code. Journal of College Student Development, 48(4), 468-480. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2007.0043
Whitley, B. E. Jr. (1998). Factors associated with cheating among college students: A review. Research in Higher Education, 39, 235-274. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018724900565
Review:
1. Reviewer's name: Name undisclosed
Review Content: Undisclosed
Review Verified on Publons
2. Reviewer's name: Name Undisclosed
Review Content: Undisclosed
Review Verified on Publons
Handling Editor: Stan Bogdanov, New Bulgarian University
Verified Editor Record on Publons