ABSTRACT IDEAS IN THE SHADOW-LINE
Vol.12, Issue 1, 2026, pp. 36-46 Full text: PDF . HTML
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33919/esnbu.26.1.3
Web of Science: [WOS=]
Author:
Armela Panajoti https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0159-9719
Affiliation: University of the Balearic Islands, Palma, Spain 03e10x626
Abstract
Conrad's The shadow-line is about the value of experience. The unnamed narrator's first command, an unmerited miracle, symbolically represents the crossing of the shadow line, or simply, the boundary between youth and maturity. In this paper, I propose that Schopenhauer's idea of education, as articulated in his essay "On Education," is exemplified in Conrad's story. It provides the theoretical foundation for the story's practical illustration of the complexities inherent in the pursuit of self-knowledge and personal growth. The story highlights the universal journey into the "twilight region between youth and maturity" (Conrad, 2003, p. 22). The young captain's identification of himself in the long legacy of past sea captains and his reliance on the abstract idea of his command prevent him from obtaining meaning from his experience. Once he detaches himself from the abstraction of his command and collaborates with the crew, he manages to obtain that "bit of ['his'] own" (Conrad, 2003, p. 3) experience. However, a full correspondence between his abstract ideas and his personal knowledge of the world is yet to be achieved.
Keywords: abstract ideas, Conrad, knowledge, maturity, youth, Schopenhauer
Article history:
Submitted: 29 March 2026
Reviewed: 15 April 2026
Accepted: 12 May 2026
Published: 20 June 2026
Citation (APA):
Panajoti, A. (2026). Abstract ideas in The Shadow-line. English Studies at NBU, 12(1), 36-46. https://doi.org/10.33919/esnbu.26.1.3
Copyright © 2026 Armela Panajoti
This is an Open Access article published and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
[[refs=]]
Review:
1. Reviewer's name: Name undisclosed
Review Content: Undisclosed
Review Verified on Publons
2. Reviewer's name: Name Undisclosed
Review Content: Undisclosed
Review Verified on Publons
Handling Editor: Stan Bogdanov, New Bulgarian University
Verified Editor Record on Publons